TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATIONAL IDENTITY OF UKRAINIANS IN DONETSK REGION DURING THE 20th AND EARLY 21st CENTURIES: A HISTORIOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26661/zhv-2025-10-62-06Keywords:
Ukrainian nation, historiography of national identity, national consciousness, Donetsk region, national identityAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive historiographical overview of the trans-formation of Ukrainian national identity in the Donetsk region (Donbas) from the 20th century to the early 21st century. It begins by framing the problem, noting that the topic remains discursive and requires deeper investigation through thematic, problematic, and chronological approaches in historiogra-phy. The authors emphasizes the need to identify pressing and debated issues, extract valuable information using a value-based approach, and align the analysis with historical periodization of national identity development. In the analysis of sources and recent studies, the article draws on foundational works by scholars such as F. Turchenko and H. Turchenko, who extensively covered the specifics of Ukrainian national identity evolution in southeastern Ukraine.
H. Kasianov’s contributions are highlighted for their balanced argumentation based on historical facts, aiding the revival of Ukrainian identity patterns in public consciousness. O. Diedush’s research is noted for its periodization of Ukrainian national identity within the historiographical process, dividing it into the “modern nation” era (from the early 20th century) and the contem-porary period (from 1991 onward). However, the authors acknowledges gaps in the historiography specifically focused on Donetsk Ukrainians during this timeframe, calling for further exploration. The publication’s goal is to char-acterize the historiographical study of this transformation. The main body of the text surveys a wide array of Ukrainian and foreign researchers’ works. It traces the roots of Russification policies back to the 18th century under tsarism, as per Turchenko and Turchenko. V. Shandra points to elements of Ukrainian identity revival in the 19th century based on folk language, while O. Kazakevych notes the conscious adoption of Ukrainian language by intel-lectuals from the mid-19th century. Yu. Nikolaiets identifies the formation of key national identity traits in Donetsk by the late 19th century, linked to the ethnic structure’s foundations. S. Liakh discusses cultural-educational activities among Ukrainian peasants in the Katerynoslav Governorate at the turn of the 20th century.
References
Biletskyi, V. Istoriia Donetskoi Kraiovoi orhanizatsii Narodnoho Rukhu Ukrainy (1989–1991 rr.). Donetsk, 2009. 172 s. [in Ukrainian].
Vasylchuk, H. M. Pershi kroky pravovoho zabezpechennya ukrayinizatsiyi v URSR (pochatok 20-kh ХХ storichchya). Visnyk Zaporizkoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky. 2004. 2: 7–10 [in Ukrainian].
Vermenych, Ya. V. Donbas u konteksti teoriy porubizhzhia: sotsiohumanitarnyi analiz. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 2015. 1: 108–134 [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsak, Ya. Narys istorii Ukrainy. Formuvannia modernoi ukrainskoi natsii ХІХ – ХХ st. Kyiv, 2000. 360 s. [in Ukrainian]. Dyedush, O. V. Istoriohrafiia doslidzhennia ukrainskoi natsionalnoi identychnosti v kintsi ХХ – na pochatku ХХІ stolittia. Dys. kand. istor. nauk (doktora filosofii). 07.00.05 “Etnolohiia”. Instytut mystetstvoznavstva, folklorystyky ta etnolohii imeni M. T. Rylskoho NAN Ukrayiny, 2021. 215 s. [in Ukrainian].
Dzyuba, I. M. Donetska rana Ukrainy: Istoryko-kulturolohichni esei. Kyiv, 2015. 78 s. [in Ukrainian].
Diyak, I. V. Piata kolona v Ukraini: zahroza derzhavnosti. Kyiv, 2006. 128 s. [in Ukrainian].
Dobrovolskyi O. “Prosvita” pid bahnetom. Sloviansk, 2007. 128 s. [in Ukrainian].
Dobrovolskyi O. Ukrainskyi rukh na Donechchyni 1917–1958. Istorychna Pravda. 28 hrudnya 2015. URL: https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/568143de77fc4/ [in Ukrainian].
Yefimenko, H. H. Zmina vektoriv u natsionalnyi politytsi Moskvy v holodomornyi 1933 r. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 2003. 5: 25–50 [in Ukrainian].
Ivanyshyn, V., Radevych-Vynnytskyi, Ya. Mova i natsia. Drohobych, 1994. 218 s. [in Ukrainian].
Kahanov, Yu. O. Konstruiuvannia “radianskoi liudyny” (1953–1991): ukrainska versiia. Zaporizhzhya, 2019. 432 s. [in Ukrainian].
Kahanov, Yu. O. Teoretychni pidkhody i kontseptualizatsiia fenomenu “radianskoi liudyny”. Zaporizhzhia Historical Review. 2019. 53 (1): 177–186 [in Ukrainian].
Kazakevych, O. M. Ukrainska mova yak chynnyk formuvannia modernoi natsii u yevropeiskomu konteksti (druha polovyna ХІХ – pochatok ХХ st.): dys. ... doktora ist. nauk: 07.00.01; 032. Kyiv, 2018. 480 s. [in Ukrainian]. Kappeler, A. Nerivni braty. Ukraintsi ta rosiiany vid seredniovichchia do suchasnosti. Chernivtsi, 2018. 320 s. [in Ukrainian].
Kasianov, H. Ukrayna-1990: “boy za ystoryyu”. NLO. 2007. 1. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2007/1/ ukraina-1990-boi-za-istoriyu.html [in Russian].
Kasianov, H. V. Teorii natsii ta natsionalizmu: monohrafia. Kyiv, 1999. 352 s. [in Ukrainian].
Kovalenko, V. Suchasna ukrainska natsionalna ideia yak nevidiemnyi chynnyk pobudovy hromadianskoho suspilstva. Viche. 2011. 23: 23–27 [in Ukrainian].
Kozhevnikov, V. Vazhkyi shliakh do ridnoi movy. Kyiv, 2002. 128 s. [in Ukrainian].
Kononenko, P. P. Mova i maibutnie narodu. Mova yak chynnyk natsionalnoi samoidentyfikatsii ukraintsiv: zbirnyk naukovykh prats NDIU. IX: 9–25 [in Ukrainian].
Lavriv, P. Natsionalna svidomist robitnytstva na Donechchyni. Suchasnist. 1992. 6: 103–107 [in Ukrainian].
Lemkyn, R. Sovetskyi henotsyd v Ukrayne. Argument. 26.11.2012. URL: http://argumentua.com/stati/rafael-lemkin-sovetskii-genotsid-v-ukraine [in Russian].
Lyakh, S. R. Spovid silskoho intelihenta mynuloho stolittia. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. 2004. 17. S: 181–183 [in Ukrainian].
Masenko, L. Mova i suspilstvo: postkolonialnyi vymir. Kyiv, 2004. 164 s. [in Ukrainian].
Masenko, L. Rich ne prosto v movnii problemi. Rich u tendentsii do rozpadu yedynoi derzhavy za movnoiu oznakoiu. Viche. 2003. 4: 54–57 [in Ukrainian].
Nikolaiets, Yu. O. Poselenska struktura naselennia Donbasu: (etnopolitychnyi aspekt dynamiky): monohrafiia. Kyiv, 2012. 188 s. [in Ukrainian].
Plokhiy, S. Selianska klio: istorychna pamiat ta natsionalna identychnist v Radianskii Ukraini. Memuary ta shchodennyky. Zaporizhzhia, 2005. Ch. 1. 12–32 (Dzherela z istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy. T. 5. Kn. 1) [in Ukrainian].
Radevych-Vynnytskyi, Ya. Ukraina: vid movy do natsii. Drohobych, 1997. 360 s. [in Ukrainian].
Rozumnyi, M. Partiinyi vybir Ukrainy. Suchasnist. 1998. 6: 34–66 [in Ukrainian].
Savoiska, S. V. Obiednavchyi potentsial ukrainskoi movy v komunikatyvnomu konteksti movnoi polityky. Naukovyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. 2014. 14: 49–58 [in Ukrainian]. Serhiichuk, V. Ukrainskyi zdvyh: u 5 t. Kyiv, 2004. 5 (Naddnipryanshchyna. 1941–1955). 2005. 834 s. [in Ukrainian].
Serhiichuk, V., Piskun, V., Voropaieva, T., Tsipko, A., Shcherbatiuk, O. Transformatsiia natsionalnoi identychnosti: istoriosofski, kulturolohichni ta sotsialno-psykholohichni aspekty. Fundamentalni oriientyry nauky. Kyiv, 2005. 24–53 [in Ukrainian].
Solchanyk, R. Ukraina, Bilorus i Moldova: intehratsiia po impersky, rusyfikatsiia i borotba za natsionalne vyzhyvannia. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. 1992. 12: 134–139 [in Ukrainian].
Steshenko, V. S. Perepysy naselennia. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy: u 10 t. Kyiv, 2011. 8 (Pa–Pryk). 520 s. [in Ukrainian].
Tarnavskyi, I. S. “Mariupolske vidrodzhennia” v umovakh natsystskoi okupatsii. Storinky istorii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kyiv, 2017. 45: 82–94 [in Ukrainian].
Temirova, N. R. Pro shcho promovliaiut monumenty Donetska? Forum krayeznavtsiv Donechchyny. Dopovidi uchasnykiv. Vinnytsya; Sloviansk, 2020. 188–192 [in Ukrainian].
Tytarenko, D. M. “Prosvita” v period natsystskoi okupatsii yak chynnyk hromadskoho zhyttia na skhodi Ukrainy (zona viiskovoi administratsii). Ukrayina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist. 2012. 22: 280–285 [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko, H. Imperskyi proekt “Novorosiia”: istoriia i sohodennia. Skhid i Pivden Ukrainy: chas, prostir, sotsium: u 2 t. Kolektyvna monohrafiya. Kyiv, 2014. 1: 206–232 [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko, H. Istorychna nauka i suchasna hibrydna viina Rosii proty Ukrainy. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. 2014. 46: 295–301 [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko, H., Turchenko, F. Proekt “Novorosiia”: 1764–2014. Yuvilei na krovi. Zaporizhzhya, 2015. 116 s. [in Ukrainian]. Turchenko, F. H. HKChP i proholoshennia nezalezhnosti Ukrainy: pohliad iz Zaporizhzhia. Zaporizhzhia, 2011. 132 s. [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko, F., Turchenko, H. Proekt “Novorosiia” i novitnia rosiisko-ukrainska viina. Kyiv, 2015. 166 s. [in Ukrainian]. Shandra, V. S. Mova yak zasib formuvannia natsionalnoi identychnosti. Ukrainska identychnist i movne pytannia v Rosiiskii imperii: sproba derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia (1847–1914). Zbirnyk dokumentiv i materialiv. Kyiv, 2013. 7–44 [in Ukrainian].
Shanovska, O. A. Zahybli, ale neskoreni bortsi za svobodu i hidnist (Oleksa Tykhyi, Yurii Lytvyn, Valerii Marchenko, Vasyl Stus). Zaporizhzhia historical review. 2018. 1 (51): 120–130 [in Ukrainian].
Shevtsova, S. Ukrainizatsiia po-moskovsky: prianyk, shcho stav batohom, abo yak bilshovyky ukraintsiv ukrainizuvaly. Ukrinform. 08.11.2018. URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2575613-ukrainizacia-pomoskovski-pranik-so-stav-batogom-abo-ak-bilsoviki-ukrainciv-ukrainizuvali.html [in Ukrainian].
Shporliuk, R. Komunizm i natsionalizm. Karl Marks proty Fridrikha Lista. Kyiv, 1998. 479 s. [in Ukrainian].
Yakubova, L., Holovko, V., Prymachenko, Ya. Russkyi myr na Donbasi ta v Krymu: istorychni vytoky, politychna tekhnolohiia, instrument ahresii: Analitychna dopovid. Kyiv, 2018. 227 s. [in Ukrainian].
ISSN 

